Human Superiority Myth Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Human Superiority Myth - Essay ExampleWhat is even out for us can be wrong for them. Stephen Budiansky, the author of the book If Lions Could Talk considers animals as intelligent as we are, but explains that it is a nonher kind of intelligence. To test animal intelligence for him is the same as to test a blind person giving him a written IQ test. Budiansky asserts that every animal has his own consort of intelligence. Monkeys performed far superior to rats in test based in visual discriminations, though rats are amend in the same test based in smell discrimination. The branching tree of evolution has not just one culmination, but millions of culminations -- represented in every invigoration species on earth today, he writes. Each is a brilliant success at what it does. And it is the nature of such brilliance that remains to hypothesize (Gabriel, 2000).As for language, animals s spot, but their way of communication differs from ours. Researcher commence counted that our closest relatives, copycats, with whom humans share an awing 98.4% DNA, use nearly 68 different sounds in their communication. Orangutans may have the approximately impressive single(a) call of any ape, the unyielding call. It begins with a low soft grumble, modulating in pitch like a string bass player using vibrato (The Animal Communication Project, n.d.). This one means that this rule has an owner and possibly calls females. Some orangutans accompany this call by crashing snags. In response this call triggers long calls from neighboring males.The pant-hoot - is one of the best-studied chimpanzeeanzee vocalizations. It begins with breathy, low-pitched hoots that segue into a series of quicker, higher-pitched in-and-out pants, as if the chimp were trying to play harmonica without an instrument. Finally the pant-hoot builds to a loud... The researcher states that human superiority is reconsidered today. Its peak is the animal rights movement, which final aim is to equate humans and ani mals beyond the law. Peter Singer, author of Animal Liberation, argues that we require to extend rights to the great apes, in the first instance, followed by all other animal species. People have always considered the most distinctive feature between them and animals the sophisticated language. As Joel Wallman, author of Aping Language, explains, ...language, at least in the European intellectual tradition, is the quintessential human attribute, at once evidence and source of most that is transcendent in us, distinguishing ours from the merely mechanical nature of the beast. In the 18th century a French philosophy, Julien Offray de la Mettrie, wrote a book titled LHomme Machine. He thought that all the creatures on the Earth are the mere machines and suggested that the reason animals cannot speak is not because of any inferiority in modestness to human beings but because of some defect in the organs of speech. He believed a young ape could be taught the use of language. The resear cher then concluds that people have overestimated our superiority and this has led to the commodious losses in nature. We use animals in our needs kill them for fun, abuse in experiments take from them their living territory, treat cruelly. Nobody has given us such a right. And we must do our best to action and preserve what can be still saved and preserved and make animals our friends.